🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."